From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 29 06:19:21 2020 Received: (at 39332) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2020 11:19:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwlNR-0002dq-OZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:19:21 -0500 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:37481) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwlNQ-0002dj-Ia for 39332@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:19:21 -0500 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail18.sd4.0x35.net [10.200.201.18]) (Authenticated sender: brice@waegenei.re) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B92131BF21B; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:19:18 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:19:18 +0000 From: Brice Waegeneire To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES. In-Reply-To: <20200128231445.GA17331@jasmine.lan> References: <1ca6544af3d10a72d2c6a6c7d7a12b67d887e104.1580250411.git.leo@famulari.name> <47a29486-a557-b7f5-645b-382b39eee571@web.de> <20200128231445.GA17331@jasmine.lan> Message-ID: X-Sender: brice@waegenei.re User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39332 Cc: 39332@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Brielmaier , Guix-patches X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2020-01-28 23:14, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: >> This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of >> 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need >> btrfs >> support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart >> from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend. > > Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's > just > me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding. Maybe %base-packages is the wrong place to add it. But it should at least be added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses btrfs which isn't the case as I recall.