From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 28 00:22:01 2020 Received: (at 39281) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2020 05:22:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59385 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwJK4-0002Mc-Up for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:22:01 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:49078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwJK2-0002MP-AI for 39281@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:21:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB4A3A43A; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:21:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIeI4XjYnrAn; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:21:52 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1580188912; bh=Zb+niG0gM/XIkTsYrOk7dVYw+TLpEa26+uBhcH6QfWE=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=PTL2j6YTDoQq/4tIswPh2m7GQdOz2XK+q/3pZXd6H3G5/A9QjPrtw8kDDCzTHjuzp x3wu1dSdJqGZAcEcYqfJQVJlDhSpR6fFWCQNmqyyBdcSDCEOUjGGhUYSlZMVthaKub 6nXmYXoyj4O6mxmtlTPs4cjf3R8/I+Sjm2JWnfkt+tmFCvdoa3e7PdkTQpSon/JwXb lpIG2XZfe3rHac47+wU7id9nG3sy68Btnq6MwbNxhTdSdzNbVhm86lkRYc/TNp6w4t BC06FKBQNZ8lQLoUjcy6X6/hHnVAKDkdTVtiABVjuPIYgzkMd7DTyXhI9PCD9PJih1 EIE2ZYW92lROg== Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 05:21:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: <7d118f5a9a05204eacd9388cf9578b2a@disroot.org> Subject: Re: bug#39281: gdm doesn't start To: "Jack Hill" In-Reply-To: References: <93d47bbc972a326dd8479b7ecee7ec83@disroot.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 39281 Cc: Leo Prikler , 39281@debbugs.gnu.org, sirgazil@zoho.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > Indeed, my system does have a really slow disk, so it would not surpris= e me if that contributed to=0A> it. Of course that shouldn't matter, but = that's the only thing I can think it. It would be nice to=0A> hear if sir= gazil can reproduce the fix since I think they were having the same probl= em on their=0A> computer.=0A=0AI see.=0A=0A> I agree that fixing is bette= r than removing. Good luck debugging. I'm happy to test, but am=0A> curre= ntly out of ideas.=0A=0ACool! I'll keep you posted.=0A=0A> I'm glad that = you took this well :). However, while I'm often sarcastic, I wasn't tryin= g to be=0A> here. What I was trying to express was that while I'm current= ly running my system with=0A> gnome-initial-setup removed doesn't mean th= at I don't appreciate the change to make it present by=0A> default. Fortu= nately for me, Guix makes this easy compared to other systems!=0A=0AHaha.= All good then. :-)=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG.