From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 29 10:22:06 2019 Received: (at 38360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2019 15:22:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iai5u-0003GY-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:22:06 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:33098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iai5r-0003G4-Ff for 38360@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:22:05 -0500 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id baaba060 for <38360@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=cUZxgu9b2OhNfR71QZrpfb HHpfVYLC78ZnUGhOPVJ2U=; b=logiKNtGyRhLsmg1dlwAurBmohjwUfeNzasubp loU2Om41eZ7In8BrVc8ZGfhs28Z2Il4fawsTzE/SLnMbZ/Fw1G9WRV9zbvdHn430 ijpo7KFpeUOuzlE76IPk2rhvcggAFOVpBsFGK4cz0vyUkV9xxwcT4O7+2UuYU2nY lsjaGXTXWS+PcTSmKqxtrFYwzcw4IovX9Bn/W8nT/iE6rr6fGg+vrFdkqDQ28ljP LEbGmC9zL0BBPU/tTpEV7IOjAQJvgCqcsR6rj7hZ98Qj1/DbkHU0CkhQ8chkfKPX hsrB4et/9sgl1292lp/kXFVfhzbM4mRX4L0pm0IUqupUMfww== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fda3a55a (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <38360@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:21:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: 38360@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG References: <87d0df7wpv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhggt186.fsf@gnu.org> <87wobj953k.fsf@nckx> In-reply-to: <87wobj953k.fsf@nckx> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:21:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87h82m908a.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38360 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I'm looking into this now. So I've installed Retroarch on Debian. They patch[0] it to hide the Updater by default but it's trivial=20 to re=C3=ABnable (tested): $ echo 'menu_show_core_updater =3D "false"' >> \ ~/.config/retroarch/retroarch.cfg This does not appease me. I'm implementing more incisive=20 measures. Thoughts? Am I an anti-choice extremist? Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://sources.debian.org/patches/retroarch/1.7.3+dfsg1-1/01_config.patch/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl3hN5UACgkQ2Imw8BjF STyKoRAAj0CnClfOqY89pCQSSd4wqZACoP3yzZCDkHAq36YGNCsliQifU8AkkqE1 7P5x+SLu9rjuEwzUFwhhNRx3m9tZl/KpCD3CD/BDaMPaCiKKgqxQWFoq9UQQKzt8 /e1z9xb94iDS7sguO3v5amVG0Z5tzl6Spp5D+huMjdWqjlpPj1n0THKwcnNDua4N pKEwljsfNtq4DtRKu7COFmOg7EZi2InPppzRU9UaAdsGQPlAUgRP10nEeds5smcm L8iweuub2D1NtImfeDav/wnfh5k0A5LNQy/P25IUz0CBPU4GTu+M4/XfxPZpbmoO lE/bUMiC6J60Kmw9ofsrkmL6f44FRyjFS677YXHKgFtXwXxX1l5FSy4vXF3nMZ7e cv5N+CHxv0azDxpWX07Co5/IgL3aMPjlwoGiVzZ2hNTT27osIAKsp7u3FlYrIvf7 sPeRft4ZwoIOd2LjjFcr6zKxRRYkn6pM8fxqpFME2HnkGQwqgzCW2+po+1I+ZjH3 1Tm5qyRr4YEi6wc9FEyo/cP40CoZX3/J/vDN6gQHKZHmnRCAjtQz4qHHfd999n0H b/Ki6KdKfbtoUJmUV0iDOU7NRGSycuOqjhg9P5b7cfTxUjuI5XNDSbmb/So6K+qS 50FjglHwKyzoc3GCMK9OOELvKB/q9eSmcQg5zlH0WgkarVQRRz8= =ffBx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--