On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Ah OK. Having an optional add-on process to work with PO files would be > nice too have. My concerns were about having PO files at the core of > the news mechanism. > > If you’re fine with the news format as it is in this patch series, then > I guess we can go ahead and push the patches? > Yes. > My feeling is that this use case doesn’t correspond to what the TP is > about, but yeah, you could ask them. > I will ask them, but later after Guix website translation is online. > Also, “urgently” won’t work because they would have to be manual > intervention by at least two people before the info reaches translators: > someone on the Guix side who’d submit a tarball (?) to the TP, and the The channel author would submit the tarball. No Guix team involved. > TP coordinator who’d notify translation teams. That’s another reason > why I’m skeptical about the applicability of this workflow for news. > […] On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > [pelzflorian wrote:] > >> I do not know what Benno thinks about this. I would prefer this to be > >> handled by some Translation Project eventually. > > You mean by some external project focused on translation, not > necessarily by the Translation Project, right? > Yes, but I still prefer the Translation Project to be where translators gather. Regards, Florian