From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 16 11:57:59 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2019 15:57:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50874 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9tO3-0003Hj-Ht for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:57:59 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50488) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9tO2-0003Hc-2E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:57:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9tNz-0000io-9o; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:57:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9tNx-0004Yc-Hk; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:57:53 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=49528 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i9tNw-0000uR-LA; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:57:53 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" Subject: Re: Getting network-manager-openconnect to work References: <87sgp4pj7s.fsf@santanas.co.za> <20190910112120.ezqnrrfffhhjvc2d@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874l1ipnlr.fsf@gnu.org> <20190912053411.bscrrsv6flzy7lgu@pelzflorian.localdomain> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Fructidor an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:57:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190912053411.bscrrsv6flzy7lgu@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:34:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2yo5j40.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Help guix , Divan Santana , bug-guix@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Florian, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:46:56PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Something I don=E2=80=99t get: why does NM itself know about openconnect? >>=20 >> There=E2=80=99s a network-manager-openconnect plugin, so I would expect >> everything openconnect to happen there. Do you know why it=E2=80=99s no= t that >> way? >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > I don=E2=80=99t know. The patch addresses (if it works) a function called > nm_vpn_openconnect_authenticate_helper within the code for > NetworkManager clients like nmtui, probably also nm-connection-editor, > that calls openconnect --authenticate. So I guess we first need someone to tell us whether the patch =E2=80=9Cwork= s=E2=80=9D, as you wrote, right? :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.