Le Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:59:53 +0200, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > Hi, > > Solene Rapenne via Bug reports for GNU Guix skribis: > > > --- > > etc/completion/bash/guix | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/etc/completion/bash/guix b/etc/completion/bash/guix > > index 26480e5863..ef98e9feca 100644 > > --- a/etc/completion/bash/guix > > +++ b/etc/completion/bash/guix > > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ _guix_complete () > > fi > > elif _guix_is_command "build" > > then > > - if _guix_is_dash_L || _guix_is_dash_m || _guix_is_dash_f > > + if _guix_is_dash_L || _guix_is_dash_m || _guix_is_dash_f || _guix_is_command "system" > > It seems to me that if _guix_is_command "build" is true, then > _guix_is_command "system" cannot also be true. WDYT? > > Thanks for addressing this longstanding issue! > > Ludo’. the file has been reworked in commits - dc3ba8c83602d69294e21d1b0c066f0d89890b56 - 80a17aae7991c6df061a98bb71734485f4ca17e2 now the code is entirely different and works as expected. IIRC when I worked on this piece of code, _guix_is_command "foobar" was looking for foobar in all words of the command. So you could have _guix_is_command returning true for "build" and "system" at the same time when using "guix system build".