From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 03:41:15 2019 Received: (at 36511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 07:41:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlqB9-0004Gt-Hu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 03:41:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]:44676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlqB7-0004Gf-OE for 36511@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 03:41:14 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDD25145F; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:41:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter05.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter05.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.123]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id IUz8gXALkN1N; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:41:00 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: bug#36511: extraneous recompiles of scm files while editing gnu/packages/ From: Robert Vollmert In-Reply-To: <3B72FD49-5C2D-40FA-885E-4D3380CB084A@vllmrt.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:40:49 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87k1cwjjul.fsf@gnu.org> <878st8g7w0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1csb2bx.fsf@gnu.org> <3B72FD49-5C2D-40FA-885E-4D3380CB084A@vllmrt.net> To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36511 Cc: 36511@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > On 9. Jul 2019, at 17:45, Robert Vollmert wrote: >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve applied your patch and am testing it now. At first glance = it doesn=E2=80=99t > improve the situation, compare the output below of running `guix build = -L .` > similar to before, after having edited check.scm. Things do seem to work stably with the patch, although I still don=E2=80=99= t see an improvement. I do repeatedly get the following warnings now, though they = don=E2=80=99t seem to break things: [ 75%] GUILEC guix/build/elm-build-system.go warning: unknown warning type `shadowed-toplevel' [ 88%] GUILEC guix/import/elm.go warning: unknown warning type `shadowed-toplevel' [100%] GUILEC guix/config.go warning: unknown warning type `shadowed-toplevel'