From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 04 12:13:03 2019 Received: (at 36469) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2019 16:13:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4M3-0003xi-60 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:13:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4M1-0003xD-85 for 36469@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:13:01 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4Lv-0005PE-Kg; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:12:56 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=34546 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4Ll-0002VY-Hh; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:12:49 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Name of the Singularity/squashfs backend? References: <20190702085601.10865-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20190702085601.10865-2-ludo@gnu.org> <87y31erqu5.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:12:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y31erqu5.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:17:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87muht22ys.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36469 Cc: 36469@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi! I=E2=80=99ve pushed these two patches, with an extra comment in the Docker = test as you suggested. Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > I think it would be good to separate squashfs-image and singularity > going forward as we discussed earlier, but for now mixing the two is > fine. So I was on the verge of renaming the =E2=80=98squashfs=E2=80=99 backend as= a first step, but I wasn=E2=80=99t sure about the name=E2=80=94naming is hard! I thought about =E2=80=98singularity=E2=80=99, but that could be confused w= ith SIF: https://github.com/sylabs/sif Then I thought about =E2=80=98singularity-squashfs=E2=80=99: it=E2=80=99s u= nambiguous but a bit long. Another option is the status quo since both =E2=80=98--help=E2=80=99 and th= e manual mention Singularity. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99.