From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 12 16:39:32 2019 Received: (at 36162) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2019 20:39:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbA1r-0007HZ-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:39:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44209) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbA1p-0007HD-Cm for 36162@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:39:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbA1j-0004wo-Hf; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:39:23 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51962 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hbA1j-0005xQ-0w; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:39:23 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: [bug#36162] [PATCH 0/4] Add 'remote-eval' References: <875zpgrjqf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87h88x7pni.fsf@gnu.org> <871s01l4c2.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87k1dtj6vr.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <87k1dqvrlh.fsf@gnu.org> <87r27ybyhy.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 Prairial an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:39:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r27ybyhy.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:43:21 -0400") Message-ID: <87ftoetu6e.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 36162 Cc: 36162@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [...] >> OTOH, we could also have =E2=80=98container-eval=E2=80=99, similar to = =E2=80=98remote-eval=E2=80=99, >> which would be useful for effectful code, such as code that needs to >> interact with the daemon. Food for thought! > > 'container' in the sense of 'guix environment' containers? Yes, but more generally in the sense of a process running in separate namespaces. Ludo=E2=80=99.