Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: Hi Tobias, >> It's not a pure guile package...should it still be named >> guile-emacsy, > > Yes. > >> WDYT? > > Personally: that the language(s) the package is *written* in don't > actually matter much. > > What matters is whether it's a library *for* that language. > > + "Emacsy is an embeddable GNU Emacs-like library for GNU Guile. > > …and it is :-) Well, that's the thing. It's a Guile library as well as an *embeddable* Guile library in C; it comes with libemacsy.so. So I guess the description is off. What about "Emacsy is an embeddable GNU Emacs-like library written in GNU Guile. It can be used as a pure Guile library, or embedded from a C program using libemacsy. It comes with a simple counter example using GLUT and browser examples in C using gtk+-3 and webkitgtk." > Which is just, like, my opinion, of course, Sure, just checking; still guile-emacsy? janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com