Ludovic Courtès writes: > Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > >>> Fixes a bug whereby 'lzread!' could return more than COUNT. >> >> Hmm... But why is this a bug? > > Because then the ‘read!’ method of the custom binary input port could > return more than ‘count’, which is understandably not permitted. That's the part where I'm a bit confused because we deal with compressed data here. So when we say "(read count)", does COUNT refer to the compressed or uncompressed data? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/