From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 05:05:51 2019 Received: (at 35586) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 09:05:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNZZG-0005ol-LE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 05:05:50 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:43132 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNZZE-0005oW-4x for 35586@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 05:05:49 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97AD8360038; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:05:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1557133534; bh=u2V0oOh0/Tfk4RdQ4ym3UdoSJeOb5wkFCUK+bUwTYlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Th0A3X/FMBGZjQLNkw7oraAxrvlZiJrOSmcN/ywyw7Gq1Wq3gRwWduIbJKiPtN6uo YrtWl1fs9fK4gS32WDqLUECn/tDQEGGGMQZKKDb1DUwAF3KWVu3J3xRk9GlN8rxUHb acePzxsx613MKZFRVDndNJ1YSDgF/MFV1Q4fuDQg= Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 11:05:34 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Raghav Gururajan Subject: Re: bug#35586: GNOME Message-ID: <20190506090534.c3xzmapsdrqtc7ww@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@disroot.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190506075159.12C59308D7@disroot.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35586 Cc: 35586@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 03:51:54AM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > On 5 May 2019 16:48, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > > You can also type both Epiphany and (your language’s translation of) > > Web in the GNOME Activities search bar to find Epiphany.  The same > > goes for Nautilus.  The terminal command is also still epiphany or > > nautilus. > > > > I do not know if it is possible to give a package two names; I believe > > it is not. > > I understand what you are saying. It appears epiphany is the old name (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web). Dev must have used epiphany now a days as a habit. > > Also, the previous blog link you sent me, recommends to use generic names. > Maybe gnome-web could be the real package’s name and there could be a package called epiphany that propagates gnome-web, like the gnome meta-package does? Same for nautilus etc. Regards, Florian