From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 17:27:57 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 21:27:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfin-0005dc-9r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfik-0005dN-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfif-0005e7-Km for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfic-0003ks-JM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfia-0005ZI-NM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:46 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfiY-0005V1-P1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 17:27:43 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556918818; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=iD8hbejJxNUSIWUQss7VWwE9pvXmoPGV4cu6knjdu2S/Bww/cTXWjpZNAz+QJgVXBXPcULwynuVL6kVt3B+wFcg08UWu30Xwj+zpIxZxpod/fSNWiFW0bX47OwNrgcf6h7qIkwsZ5qEIMn5/18uZL5Cke4owPf48bnqEwG3vLf0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1556918818; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=XjhuAUoW/XgLv8jbSFqKQlGLPZsuhvyIfw+KlStPyVs=; b=jgAD3Pz0JaPn5BLsDQJed5yKBmvGS+ra/XnURq+VlzTk2lxl2jtvaO3H0+vPo99va/ShmwYSZXIOZ7NDcmYwe3wlcQAv/ZFrnn20iDaNuysMuv2q/RZdixD27KbCb312ICslsnlziZFeRQ/L7oJlgyfR0lr9t5FiwV1znSQ7cuc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1556918818; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=478; bh=XjhuAUoW/XgLv8jbSFqKQlGLPZsuhvyIfw+KlStPyVs=; b=VC8JFSDmD8b3OEO6EJYpQcTmJcIb3WZSHPg0i+e6KKE0TgAnmulTteQi0aQcSnio rbjjo4U3s4gkTVWXFFUHqbTOgRYcSUjep7Tk/UliAHGNdT+3skrg1fqe7n28Nf1FHea o9lJpvNsZy2NryoKPd4jarCbZCFvhQSFynPedINs= Received: from localhost (p54AD4EB5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.78.181]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1556918817040312.4777623089183; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:26:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <87sgtv8hcz.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Installer: wpa_supplicant fails to start In-reply-to: <87sgtv8hcz.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 23:26:52 +0200 Message-ID: <877eb7grfn.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 136.143.188.53 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: sirgazil , Bug Guix X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ricardo and sirgazil reported on IRC that the =E2=80=98wpa-supplicant=E2= =80=99 would > (sometimes?) fail to start for the in the installation image on their > laptop. What I observed was that the wpa-supplicant *service* would not start and starting it manually would fail because a wpa_supplicant *process* would already be running. Upon killing the stray process the service could be started. --=20 Ricardo