From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 06 15:47:57 2019 Received: (at 35550) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2019 19:47:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNjaf-0008Ts-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 15:47:57 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:43972 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNjad-0008Tk-9t for 35550@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 15:47:55 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E646360038; Mon, 6 May 2019 21:47:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1557172061; bh=qCTwGzpTNH6vbiBFGrVf+fnjVNTQR0+4uVQauZAZXt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OF0bl9XaFnq/sTNcFDMrupzSlxO8gREV1pcK3+9TjBW3v2pplsJVXZEoDIHwcBJSB gapmK+Jdv5cfZeRS9fg7KCscx+xduvnLcEaJ4uN+FGXb6QrjGUbHMH90ankp8MaAnE K8Vpv3j3hmgLdlXf6b+lg8Gd8MdvUobKik3B9h8A= Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 21:47:41 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#35550: Installer: wpa_supplicant fails to start Message-ID: <20190506194741.qm7uha4fomsngdga@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <87sgtv8hcz.fsf@gnu.org> <875zqr8dnw.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1f4y23d.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87k1f4y23d.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 35550 Cc: sirgazil , 35550@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 12:21:26AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It’d be great if you could do some testing with the patch below. Then I > guess we’ll push a Shepherd release with this fix. > The second patch (the one for Guix is the only one I have tested) works fine on the system which always failed before since sometime after 1.0. One time wpa-supplicant worked fine but it had an error establishing the internet connection, but I am quite certain it was an unrelated hardware issue. Regards, Florian