From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 27 10:19:20 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 14:19:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39167 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgVFA-0002ET-7x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:19:20 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgVF9-0002EL-4I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:19:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgVF4-0004Hu-2x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:19:19 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgVF0-0003Gr-2z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:19:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:45620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgVEx-0003AT-JX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:19:09 -0400 Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D521B9350 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1561645136; bh=k+A3pqexCztIdCuikcDJK2jKhdcIPU33ZzMssjMnhZY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=T45alBvdmSs4E2i0jFUMS2LS3ddQOxYfP62gY3wM+xb2/kVvDjkWxx8DT3SE9xTf2 Uu469gkkrR3jyjsfhcmGh5qoPquB+1i0IrWooZQjBmgaNpQk3UbWRNod/rgmBZEdfK c2gtorIN3FKxxc7Puj7bPZsjpgX4DIQvS6ijxXMM= X-Riseup-User-ID: FC2F5A591A6F654211243A54E8C16C267E0FAEEB59CDDDB68C6B7E632B526AB8 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EC0F1203DC for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [bug#35302] Update ASDF Version to 3.3.3. To: guix-patches@gnu.org References: <87pnplnyvh.fsf@gmail.com> From: swedebugia Message-ID: <934f3db5-792c-78cc-277e-da0107743136@riseup.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:18:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pnplnyvh.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 198.252.153.129 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On 2019-04-17 04:34, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > This patch overwrites the ASDF version vendored into SBCL with the > newest version. The SBCL devs have stated[1] that they are not planning > on keeping their version of ASDF up to date. This will allow our SBCL > packages to use the newest ASDF going forward so. > > [1] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1823442 > > > This seem to have fallen through the cracks. Can someone with cl knowledge review this? -- Cheers Swedebugia