Well, now that I actually test it - yes. But I said it had not because the 'herd status ssh-daemon' message indicated that it isn't running: root@janus ~# herd status ssh-daemon Status of ssh-daemon: It is stopped. It is enabled. Provides (ssh-daemon). Requires (syslogd loopback). Conflicts with (). Will be respawned. Is this maybe a side effect of strace being involved? -- Brant Gardner On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, at 05:14, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Brant, > > Thanks for sending the log! > > "Brant Gardner" skribis: > > > 284 09:31:59 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4 <0.000013> > > 284 09:31:59 connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/dev/log"}, 110) = 0 <0.000014> > > 284 09:31:59 sendto(4, "<38>Oct 9 09:31:59 sshd[284]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22.", 67, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 67 <3.103979> > > 284 09:32:02 close(4) = 0 <0.000016> > > 284 09:32:02 socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 4 <0.000024> > > 284 09:32:02 fcntl(4, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR) <0.000011> > > 284 09:32:02 fcntl(4, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 <0.000011> > > 284 09:32:02 fcntl(4, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 <0.000011> > > 284 09:32:02 setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000011> > > 284 09:32:02 setsockopt(4, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000011> > > 284 09:32:02 bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(22), sin6_flowinfo=htonl(0), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::", &sin6_addr), sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = 0 <0.000014> > > 284 09:32:02 listen(4, 128) = 0 <0.000012> > > 284 09:32:02 getpid() = 284 <0.000011> > > 284 09:32:02 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 5 <0.000013> > > 284 09:32:02 connect(5, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/dev/log"}, 110) = 0 <0.000014> > > 284 09:32:02 sendto(5, "<38>Oct 9 09:32:02 sshd[284]: Server listening on :: port 22.", 62, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 62 <4.195488> > > 284 09:32:07 close(5) = 0 <0.000019> > > I’m under the impression that sshd successfully start this time, didn’t it? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. >