From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 01:30:25 2019 Received: (at 34568) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 06:30:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53751 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gvyvB-0005gu-2g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:30:25 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:52906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gvyv9-0005dY-2e for 34568@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:30:24 -0500 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 90ce7091; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 06:30:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=XwV81Keod1yDjNuT+ppSTi agvaryOL2e3u4Wa1B0UiU=; b=A1aLTgkJrEhx/ikt0whFhIePs/pBXN41bAwcmu V2MHTQ4Ar76D87DRtsuX2l3dOMq5nKmNsvU1l6Z727HBJTLusdLNG5v+KuZ2ySfQ jUiOG6B0tqUw959Cgx1e0YcJXpFouTtr5/dRbPzw40d6R+L+EQHtDAAtEzfgXI4v 46r+PfwqjdN+Xy1uhWYI0N5mK8upOLDV5b1NV+Cr/gasIfQdpJqyvZroCvh5LeLk +KiPrWB/rByEdEahNEa59vmf5ruiNteI2RjLKf5CvSd6xZ7jsa48yK3fuCnlGPdc byWb2wfmMpCDYfs4A2Q/UOoWhbg+JqzuccJerZqc5pdsYxlg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7848daec (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 06:30:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#34568: flash-image.armhf-linux appears to succeed, when it actually failed References: <87sgwkqpyh.fsf@netris.org> In-reply-to: <87sgwkqpyh.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:30:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87wolwwarx.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34568 Cc: 34568@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Mark, Not much help, but: Mark H. Weaver wrote: > The following build appears to have succeeded: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3378988 > > but if you look at the tail of the build log, it seems that it > actually > failed: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/3378988/log/tail-reload This looks very similar to #34276. Kind regards, T G-R