From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 13:25:53 2021 Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 17:25:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lS14r-0006V9-Ja for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:25:53 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:33142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lS14q-0006Uv-3u for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:25:52 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lS14j-0007aS-6L; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:25:45 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible" In-Reply-To: <87zgyj5a33.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg0i43j.fsf@netris.org> <87d0psi1xo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sgynezha.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvj2yesd.fsf@netris.org> <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org> <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org> <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org> <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org> <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zgyj5a33.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:23:51 -0400 Message-ID: <875z15c3zx.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848 Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant , 33848@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > What could have been nice is if there=E2=80=99s a way to mark specific st= rings > as being ASCII, or if there=E2=80=99s a =E2=80=9Cbyte vector=E2=80=9D dat= a type compatible with > strings, for instance. Do we know that all strings containing store references will be representable in ASCII? Mark