From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 13 12:19:12 2019 Received: (at 33639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2019 16:19:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hFLN1-0003aa-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 12:19:12 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:45683) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hFLMz-0003aF-17 for 33639@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 12:19:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1555172341; bh=NE5tO6qAWDkau5LlvkQuZK+643TIQQWSVpzGaj6FGMo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=F6RDzRomjrXl/PWL1mBiqxerBW5LflyH1bOChF6gxi6cVZPccmTl3xuBjoWR8WWlo xfhOAyXKJDimMSOz8dO1h+q20SmtYJsoRemAsbXj5fJ8Kk+zCDExDmhfXfkHxwpZJu e36fIOsRB/Q4bNpMH103l93GQIQMK4ijK114f2RE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([87.167.207.225]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoVja-1gdXVX32RW-00garZ; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:19:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:20:57 +0200 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: bug-xorriso@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#33639: ISO installer image is broken on i686 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <20190413134609.kwmx53hyawgtaaza@pelzflorian.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20190413134609.kwmx53hyawgtaaza@pelzflorian.localdomain> Message-Id: <3867672606037906126@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VsQKgOz6QNl5pDeRZqfT76gdX7p4RlTBjQfEM7b6k/1cOXY522L zOTxdrYZ4hpSjq5ZQ4xbPLUtcpqSBQNbul6Ts3m+zTnXOuCX66tWcBLBhLyn0axX+uK09rb 2hlJ4Rxq7eajQWzC7des2QnwGHaaRzVRGEAqvqgtIPE9bEsjbj4UHcr3wX/7caUMcpA7Km8 2yVs3lEajReVDrNY8oVmQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:l2X494SMdWk=:FcOnhzgdNcpyLMruyKBkVg zgmO4MGnCBoEFYOKTwCvuLIvxgDKizK6tiV/heH4J9r7oz8IOxC9dM0giCmgNKvskls76/eQG HWUfo0kqNnt7UMg8eKogcnDbhgq6vrCvXQSWIxbXAE+RgYnYWWERnATOcGRLsUl6unzkDC6mK vfKxx3BYdfR7nUtXm+VMgQaNsxa9NysNlwENRAtv4XC55eOKY2jhaGBhpliXbnYQqarNv1ko/ LXJjUhHcN8I0cggDcjbYvTMODy3rhZ2kEdCtPZ87ZjPKSendnI0UqxINxbUl73u8UIf3MDu5c nTAEKF+MW9KzlopxL8ErfxeQirW08nzdHzxk8yvsgIySt+55eML/O8g2aVXUEAtZhwMOkWH3E lubwhYtEGb3rxMw/tmZJkyHdLpvp9NmYPQHgsgZmKVPkGMgnxEnAMOTjyBLU0h2sz49EPJAIz 6caizHIAsPdLeAcL4TYPBr5BBHAvAPwJaa+z2IiRrij3iHo5S5+Cs6hJDRr69pO0zYGFt4SH9 lDNUcR/4f6q5mnJXBXP6c+M6657wJr10FulLN88TV5Bc88skS+EJK0MzRods/+974GtKI0YzG 3gOnGMI+EQuLXBJCZ14oVebCSIJkjpz787cVwK2sXuuvOzH5nBiCkwlDysQ0nq2b6Kp0DbM7u wsI5sPqqB3Ix87K7LyHfcSUXyWoiaFqb4e2SYdu+Fw1C953l7ThS8SBcjLYBiYFRGIFYPni9P idZOyRg0MvNsqdFCLm8vQW0O7fBjpI3t8VhD47AhmelTeTRd74VVtqoRPdIgBTMjSlEzzazqf 2GJV7DsRFevvC4iKaYA+djM35kJwc6CadZd0TXg2+sF6KNRiuSumzMTIdpgKXa54YDKRHxIUe Rdegwupi1E2MLj9fd7efIS2fEEDcK9lIRDlBGq6NErr8bz3aC087zjZmkRHnABC+3ujoOckNo sVhVXK5zn8A== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33639 Cc: pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de, 33639@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, Florian Pelz wrote: > Yes, it seems fixed, I can confirm. Way back in december, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >...> Based on this and on a suggestion Ricardo made on IRC, I passed >...> -padding 10m and that solved the problem. \o/ Please do not forget to remove this -padding command. Florian Pelz wrote: > The content is different at the beginning of the ISO image > (maybe padding or timestamps in the file system) That's to expect if not environment SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set and exported. SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH belongs to the specs of reproducible-builds.org. It is supposed to be either undefined or to contain a decimal number which tells the seconds since january 1st 1970. If it contains a number, then it is used for all timestamps and as seed of pseudo-random numbers like MBR id or GPT UUIDs. If all files and directories have the same names and the same content, then xorriso runs with the same arguments and the same SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH value are supposed to create byte-identical result ISOs. In december, i wrote: >...> > Creation Time: 1970010119010649 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >...> For reproducibility purposes we set timestamps and related things >...> to the Epoch. Is this independent of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ? Have a nice day :) Thomas