From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 07 20:57:07 2018 Received: (at 30254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2018 01:57:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gKZZD-0007A5-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:57:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gKZZC-00079U-9t for 30254@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:57:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKZZ6-0008UB-HT for 30254@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:57:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKZYx-0008Oe-Hb; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:56:51 -0500 Received: from localhost ([::1]:44866 helo=mikegerwitz-pc.gerwitz.local) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gKZYx-0006FO-CQ; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:56:51 -0500 From: Mike Gerwitz To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [bug#30256] [PATCH 3/3] scripts: environment: Add --no-cwd. In-Reply-To: <87murcdaui.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:19:33 +0200") Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:56:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87lg64xrfx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vag2wopo.fsf@gnu.org> <7bc71eaa3cff48ec7dc0d4fe406dde9482b716a9.1516937216.git.mtg@gnu.org> <87tvtyhhnd.fsf@gnu.org> <87murcdaui.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) OpenPGP: id=22175B02E626BC98D7C0C2E5F22BB8158EE30EAB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30254 Cc: 30254@debbugs.gnu.org, 30256@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludo: On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 15:19:33 +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > There=E2=80=99s this last patch from the series you submitted a while back > that=E2=80=99s ready modulo an issue with the test. Could you take a loo= k? I'm not ignoring this; I'll have time to look over the next couple of weeks. I'll need to research the issue. =2D-=20 Mike Gerwitz --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJb45fSAAoJEIyRe39dxRuisEMQALzkRSbdn1DLakjTK2vMJTMh oNJI00NgVPrmTbCgohtIZCvW9rhdmhgDmWr3gSM1I+3ptMKoN79kQCcT3O/seKWd 1oh1MOswwwzNaZPBuVqq8m8FjE25OmYm4+FAT+KJWV3xBA2t3gUuxWway4OLmL7w wFkMTWUftScog0Aa2BceI56dXT6YmheajMoTjhhc27lnAT71Yf3qPsNfjs7VpGjY Wqz6oC7h3Kv44WNN7KbUV0Zilvfh/zpU8AKeayovd9v4gQUudiCtPEimPi9VPeuZ pvQk412DOfTAZYSCai8y8+2JYsXks+BGXd1+yX/cOqHp7tvAcrDxna96X0H1DS4d +O1srjpEhsb39HvCnya/u6c7ltWNjUAdojksm2KpY5eMjQkvkhV5O6K/0wAZf53l 9jyd4uJ9hLYqKlspbiTvFCAqa3SDp43/deKT3PR1Gd7x04c7R+GtF9PLwvIOSsVY ZUlsujv/YWQqGVt9LJ0XN2ffQ+wyZ8xxIyPQBtnRUHNFlJrOIXxtkuRKdVuSDB4g kZPky1QyBhG9HldJEDyvr3JXeyDxgPGBxpAt0K3vadv+5fL59+7Q59oaSnKkC2ln FpXEw+8cz+93Xjh8N3zybBl9sGfh+LVp87Cjd06Dlw+g/bcCsCoRGV165VHa3kuy bAe5pEu9SpGWVxBcicgv =V7Ay -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--