From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 26 17:06:26 2017 Received: (at 29448-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2017 22:06:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ54D-0007JD-24 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:06:26 -0500 Received: from [141.255.128.1] (port=48264 helo=hera.aquilenet.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ549-0007J2-Cm for 29448-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:06:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDA0EE99; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:06:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a7Jj2yc1qJff; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:06:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA6437449; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:06:21 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Matt Wette Subject: Re: bug#29448: Acknowledgement ([wishlist] nice option for guix) References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 Frimaire an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:06:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Matt Wette's message of "Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:17:08 -0800") Message-ID: <878tesvgo5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Matt Wette skribis: > scratch that. > When I executed `guix pull' the processes were not niced, but once the builds started, the nice did seem to be there. Good. :-) Build processes inherit the “nice” value from guix-daemon, indeed. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo;id=hera.aquilenet.fr;ip=141.255.128.1;r=debbugs.gnu.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29448-done Cc: 29448-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Matt Wette skribis: > scratch that. > When I executed `guix pull' the processes were not niced, but once the builds started, the nice did seem to be there. Good. :-) Build processes inherit the “nice” value from guix-daemon, indeed. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo;id=hera.aquilenet.fr;ip=141.255.128.1;r=debbugs.gnu.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Matt Wette skribis: > scratch that. > When I executed `guix pull' the processes were not niced, but once the bu= ilds started, the nice did seem to be there. Good. :-) Build processes inherit the =E2=80=9Cnice=E2=80=9D value from g= uix-daemon, indeed. Ludo=E2=80=99.