From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 22 19:01:25 2020 Received: (at 29296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2020 23:01:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcGfN-0003j0-DR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:01:25 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:55789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcGfL-0003io-WF for 29296@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:01:24 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D484A5C008E; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:01:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 May 2020 19:01:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=2yKUw4jWHpeZKVhvFsS22WJegU LA/Ti8qvmGJMCmfrs=; b=gkk5pAQC0V689x7ztpa4MEorzJ7NIs3Yo1XWlngKe1 oTHhcNeefqIIzhSA1GcqZ5Dcx8a7I+QH2SJnWDMMGInnZuEkl8PGVQW1HveOAuqm 8cpF9ZkabD60bP+HJ2VGlT+MBovKQYT6NvLhcmf0b1FWYEx/utYiI7ll5Hpr5LgR Jy12NB43crrg7LAzRl1rx7i6tvOV4qzugRsOWEt4a/bVB9mtNKHOmzGOqiigeFgI HgC/ktIMj/mUR3konDOlz4G3R1mYYFB6eCCkZch3E8Eqd8iic++b2ryVUMMKAIA/ RLACYutUjPcPDBa8dTg/VqNYVOUi7K9fOdpjG0u197jw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=2yKUw4 jWHpeZKVhvFsS22WJegULA/Ti8qvmGJMCmfrs=; b=gfJ/dplghXsZwlwDpZ45Gh lPC5qDav56ydMtgDlof7z1oFvH5+QSLxBOBYmoKqyke08RRqFfbU3VG+1r8aK76F r0SnmqDcv1j4QebXQE/ahPG4WFlrKPLNhp8gZneiSJkd6m7cyVDeiGJ5VnrrL+J0 EzkmMblEc8ZpKZ256TTPiidHkdu01zFKbMZv98h40Pr4NtsMe7OdlZfxlmR1P74/ mLkbK9xk7RG0//qpcNSUZ/n6byZWKvhqpGxrYLqI1NmgdvhfpSjuDU8AoQXCaIX7 WDtK2fxgu+jbYGlLih2qolWUKqQRckSrGa/euNF6rZOusMTl5pM8Ap6MyrkYPiaA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddugedgudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehgtderredtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhu shcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedtvdfggeevgeeivdffueejiedttedvkedtudfggfdtgeefiedtieekffdu gfeuffenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtgho mh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C48230664D9; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:01:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Danny Milosavljevic , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#29296] [PATCH 2/2] gexp: Add 'let-system'. In-Reply-To: <20200523004434.059d1960@scratchpost.org> References: <20171114162515.8743-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20171114162515.8743-2-ludo@gnu.org> <87fu9fsrxn.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv3mk2ql.fsf@gnu.org> <20200523004434.059d1960@scratchpost.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 01:01:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87blmf8thf.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29296 Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , 29296@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi Ludo, > > maybe a little off-topic, but why do I have to use the following patch on > armhf-linux (*not* cross compiling) in order to stop it from pulling in > i686-cross-gcc? Can you give a little more context? Did this occur after the let-system patch, or is this when using let-system? Can you paste the derivation for mes@0.19 in the context this occurs? Also, please file a new bug report. > Makes no sense to me at all... If only all bugs were obvious, our jobs would be so much easier! > diff --git a/gnu/packages/mes.scm b/gnu/packages/mes.scm > index 347aef0..524b8e8 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/mes.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/mes.scm > @@ -120,8 +120,9 @@ extensive examples, including parsers for the Javascript and C99 languages.") > ((string-prefix? "x86_64-linux" target-system) > ;; Use cross-compiler rather than #:system "i686-linux" to get > ;; MesCC 64 bit .go files installed ready for use with Guile. > - `(("i686-linux-binutils" ,(cross-binutils "i686-unknown-linux-gnu")) > - ("i686-linux-gcc" ,(cross-gcc "i686-unknown-linux-gnu")))) > + `( ;("i686-linux-binutils" ,(cross-binutils "i686-unknown-linux-gnu")) > + ;("i686-linux-gcc" ,(cross-gcc "i686-unknown-linux-gnu")) > +)) > (else > '()))) > ("graphviz" ,graphviz) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7IWbwACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqZmAf/YsKv3Xx2cklU9UZkQn+QlEuJMm7GEq3hXvkrmIozyFiIYhNLPaFl7TWO Ed3dClkZDHiFN4VYFjaLa3q726m0ANrBc2uie/Ri7Xg8L5fqWJLdJgOJ0poPcTk0 0Qt0jIyaM7THrzHKt7wZN0xeVAFrI/RT0b9A2uDu9vrjPLNikXDS4LsxBaOu+0CL 3cQHFdjyc2afHM/4HJPPVUG5g2SvtmEq2TeF8tSmlJv0b7IZeeOPF1JRIWwi5Bkv n6YDA96BlTqbgL33663mcpQHa/1pdbyW/ezVC+DgQmngkEUJFoVWFgvUbknc+O1L zJ7x9rZAMjlj7XzbBmZYvcrdZEE63Q== =tSFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--