From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 09 21:04:58 2019 Received: (at 26302) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2019 01:04:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i7UaY-0002di-Ce for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:04:58 -0400 Received: from sender4-pp-o94.zoho.com ([136.143.188.94]:25487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i7UaV-0002dW-HY for 26302@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:04:57 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568076579; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=CFKN1WRF2TZbmtgphnja6P+HLJRkAEsjQD/bvCenWWtWv2/BeQG1WovvUxndj1wFOAqJhsjDnz+dxI+QmQqFum4g2dBnVzVa02QUgG8D6iTGOkMqjdKnMFfzKMCzB/qHgWlvM1lDCeO6fWKhrqfEilZaYYAYyOe8HFxKFBev9pA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1568076579; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=f0fCgtUIrmtMrT4jtDTCWbce3QS34bPiuQrC+TcXoFE=; b=OVrKzKm0eofjnJgOUm9sy/BlFu8tadZREEdd1wDG6WhFQSmlEL6txUmDHUlM2gEdkNqHg4RNt8GlvvPhAEEz272E9Kw4L1Y0Vb1EDukaTRpiAQr5oxUO3eb8V6qbgVx/RSYBh08fDrhfpP/Y6muJFnfb7jcyIm9DF7ERDlz6RMs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sirgazil@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=H7c8P4Gc8hYPSvPnPQtC1ihOtBemFbiL/MKYeRgXZ3+WC2yPNXZhbUJdMAEhPkXJ3fNrf2ACFBMo yVzdX5Jdr/XW1vGHrh+WUULCav8gfVyYA1RW1KM4ULrt2GiWgBaF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1568076579; s=zm2019; d=zoho.com; i=sirgazil@zoho.com; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=1448; bh=f0fCgtUIrmtMrT4jtDTCWbce3QS34bPiuQrC+TcXoFE=; b=nNQ3Xr/ID+aYiwRlZQI9hgch3id19waBsSjjfdB5nllMCfIhIZPwLWfjp4aCqudF mZmG8zB7Zts4rBwXQb4dUhXmxIo4Z425yTZnb8TiSX5zcC3u0vIg6SUIgIrOsPN30zJ vZpc/nllDholAQsrL2LIFxQD9TgEhqgDR8hefYj4= Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1568076573162516.919970858339; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [179.15.13.185] by mail.zoho.com with HTTP;Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 19:49:33 -0500 From: sirgazil To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Message-ID: <16d18a5a9e8.12ab66c8254154.2756956535677606704@zoho.com> In-Reply-To: <20190908171638.cna67eearj4rbn2k@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20170329154040.ddscahwp2agknihb@abyayala> <16d07cb5a1d.ca69255821627.8144164908931126811@zoho.com> <20190908171638.cna67eearj4rbn2k@pelzflorian.localdomain> Subject: Re: bug#26302: [website] translations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: Medium User-Agent: Zoho Mail X-Mailer: Zoho Mail X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26302 Cc: 26302 <26302@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ---- On Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:16:38 -0500 pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote ---- > > Regarding URLs, I would prefer using IRIs, like follows:=20 > >=20 > > /IETF-LANGUAGE-TAG/path/to/resource/=20 > >=20 > > So:=20 > >=20 > > /es-ES/v=C3=ADdeos/=20 > > /es-CO/videos/=20 > >=20 > =20 > As I understand it, es and es-ES and es-Latn-ES would all be language=20 > tags (or just subtags??) for Spanish from Spain. Do we use the full=20 > tag es-Latn-ES? Probably es-ES makes more sense than es-Latn-ES for=20 > many languages (but not all). The Translation Project will generally=20 > only provide one script, it seems. Maybe often es is enough. I=20 > suppose we could write an associative list mapping locales for which=20 > translations exist to language tags.=20 I'm not suggesting any particular IETF language tags for Spanish variants, = though. I think one could start supporting only the language tags equivalen= t to the teams defined in the Translation Project (TP).=20 In the case of Spanish, many libre projects start focusing only on "es" (wh= ich is the case for the TP), and that's ok, but it's good to support varian= ts. As far as I understand, the TP allows creating teams for language varia= nts (there is a pt_BR team). For example, I'd like to have an "es-CO" catal= og to override some translations of the "es" catalog that are only common i= n Spain.