From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 08 11:16:53 2022 Received: (at 26247) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2022 15:16:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ohBZN-00041O-0B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:16:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:47040) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ohBZJ-00040V-US for 26247@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:16:50 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id bk15so11094031wrb.13 for <26247@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:16:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E4u6ARcqeRbxHKgSeBREFA9laVcXGr+gaulHbhwiXN8=; b=Tv5eyST8DbQHSqorurmZbEMiIJ8n61jOAcDK1c8eKwgR2KKGkrA9nQ6WIRKgIs4XMI AbP0Qlmh8zqvImTfypV4l0AAl+hVNpgJi+gl8UrNNo9csNQv77ITROujpDMrabHeOMBr xjhcWf5588UG2xdUjdrcehnOwLFWTSAwV5sbBs5CGLHcN44CVYTGrblO4eXVpKykWMN2 W/sSVWjRZqz0v0kpnwi9b0ndwEU2Tkq9gfjq6+pHcr8A1mIYUEu873qE5f4h0ArpkUmV OeqmD21rLoEt0lRGCGA67mml/P3MtwPqJAVqJWxKMUosFqi00YTvtCCYfmP5JHnyRZG7 DWeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E4u6ARcqeRbxHKgSeBREFA9laVcXGr+gaulHbhwiXN8=; b=lKFQS1caNjapZuqkRxAoi2Yc8YMzi5rGKqLa5euYniaG1GKv0TRSzA0rknzYpg1Cur lOTim54hy3JQ+k/nsbsJLKzr7+bTpJnUjlvTqokbj6rOVQV0HqvI2xrn3D3o83Tq8aSE vGarAPgdgAksUdfCvWrN05MkSLj80gF7fwUDNDllpah2t/3wjBvsnTXtvQdekDLEt4PJ Wlb0MV3RWstvb4GZDTcGsHu9uhFRcuMfU0OOb7YrdamweLa4POYSC448caWnEJtc8lGC /wWch1Hdfq0RpCAy6gK5WeUfsE8biNqsjmPWksd+x86BpuxB7qsPCS/+dzZwCvtW1w81 zFyA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3freozCqJlB7yi9OXzAB5vjCxgFbDR55vh5M2yTq97lsBIaqWF sj0nfrPH8YQr9nl/8mk4Iws6161KRkU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4T8uN9tqoZWtgCKuDgGI1oil71XYI25jzY8uQKBNEaDQqjxezUw9qM+vCLX6vCLadY+u9Zsw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5a8f:0:b0:22f:9396:4908 with SMTP id bp15-20020a5d5a8f000000b0022f93964908mr1584400wrb.273.1665242204396; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17-20020a05600c459100b003b4a68645e9sm11026179wmo.34.2022.10.08.08.16.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Oct 2022 08:16:43 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Miguel =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81ngel?= Arruga Vivas Subject: Re: bug#26247: Gettext introduces timestamps in .mo files References: <8760iyxp3t.fsf@gnu.org> <865z5luzxx.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9djgox5.fsf@gnu.org> <87blfbdka0.fsf@gnu.org> <875z58fp8e.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 16:25:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875z58fp8e.fsf@gmail.com> ("Miguel =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81ngel?= Arruga Vivas"'s message of "Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:26:25 +0100") Message-ID: <868rlqtmsu.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26247 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Julien Lepiller , 26247@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Miguel, It is about an old patch [2] and on old message from Dec. 2020. On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 14:26, Miguel =C3=81ngel Arruga Vivas wrote: > This bug has already been reported upstream[1] and probably I'll push it > as soon as I have more test cases prepared and receive a brief review, > but I can prepare a patch for previous versions if it's needed too. > > Best regards, > Miguel > > [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59658 Are commits 4343ca8ba5b02c8fe09e5bd681abbc0440ab8b08 and following the ones mentioned here? Well, I am not sure to understand if it had been fixed upstream [1]. Cheers, simon 2: