From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 28 15:51:27 2016 Received: (at 25281) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2016 20:51:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMLC3-0003Qr-57 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:51:27 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]:36489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMLC1-0003QW-JL for 25281@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:51:25 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id k15so119442376qtg.3 for <25281@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:51:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=craven.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u5bqGTmTTS7sqDoZPsYGuFMMQqOTpwiEdlXxS09+Yc4=; b=jkVROXaCU9RNTj0VxiURGr8PHrRI4qHmt1TlfROA3KyYDmSTiznAvCDai5ZXeeO6HB /+Vcs7M68lYetW402KQU0IDxHxYqkXqak4AzX4xJUTnVT9DfsoV+dq05JrRchIkJvE5o bAwXs4X6vdO9FjfoDSsr8yhD2BJ+M60dZTdpM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u5bqGTmTTS7sqDoZPsYGuFMMQqOTpwiEdlXxS09+Yc4=; b=YWGv98ns+RTBgMQTb0Y8tWIC8ogvc4P795juqfxUpAlgzPGnCKr6yme0WgJHsBDQ8u nz6V5lTmT+M8wShwEIM+nHF8rlEAg9PHm0XEhYRaRI/x5TdfkhdQa2gIQf6d7fmWDWDY +ja+0j7DbY8wqsn4drwYdgtnveojSn4pL05H4oaWjnO4Y40ZZqrEV8va7d7j50nIkPQc HEFnpHDbLegsZQi8X8+JJyejGg2PetyskGotjR4jJoSTl3KfxRq/SxZKTL2msiSnlo0n a6gpX+/BwCLumN2y+OD8AoGiftDnCXZoezoFqv+Nujs5ZixXcqCX2re5c6ldxn/zd4Ym lnVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJqSVvO9XvdyA54HtQ++Ae8wTdSQOQpSCmJTnrMAJqGDmNCMfG9CPJAgl7rF7E/dAXZNWs2B+qx1klQgQ== X-Received: by 10.200.33.244 with SMTP id 49mr35691735qtz.70.1482958279836; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:51:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.133.38 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:51:19 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [151.248.146.13] In-Reply-To: References: <87zijhuzcv.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> From: David Craven Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 21:51:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25281: rust importer duplicates input To: Ricardo Wurmus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25281 Cc: ng0 , 25281@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) > Could the importer be changed to either ignore targets that don=E2=80=99t= match > the current architecture or to uniquify the list of inputs? It could, but I don't see an advantage. It takes more than just removing duplicate inputs for the thing to build. I'd find time spent on a Cargo.lock parser (which should be quite easy) to be more useful, but if someone wants to do it...