From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 02 18:00:53 2016 Received: (at 23877) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2016 22:00:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34906 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJSy5-0004j9-0o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:00:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJSy2-0004ir-Pb for 23877@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:00:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJSxu-00048D-Hc for 23877@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:00:45 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJSxu-000480-C5; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:00:42 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:38870 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bJSxs-0003Ab-Im; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:00:40 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Eus Subject: Re: bug#23877: [Guix Info][7.1.4] Should remind user to do "guix pull" References: <1037661467351234@web1j.yandex.ru> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 15 Messidor an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 00:00:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1037661467351234@web1j.yandex.ru> (eus@member.fsf.org's message of "Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:33:54 +0700") Message-ID: <8737nrg0oq.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23877 Cc: 23877@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Hello! Eus skribis: > Hi guys! (And gals, etc.) > I did that and my machine started to build sources. Then, I hit some erro= r when building webkitgtk-2.12.0 and went to the Guix IRC channel. There tw= o users told me that I should do "guix pull" first so that I do not have to= build from source. > > So, I think it is best to mention about "guix pull" in the Guix info page= section 7.1.4. I wouldn=E2=80=99t recommend running =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D from the i= nstallation image. We arrange to keep binaries that correspond to releases on our servers, but apparently we failed here, at least for some of the 0.10.0 binaries. Had they been available, you wouldn=E2=80=99t have had to build WebKitGTK on your machine (which is arguably a terrrible user experience for a first install!). The fix here is for us to make sure binaries are retained long enough. Thanks for your report! Ludo=E2=80=99.