From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 25 14:06:25 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2016 18:06:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7s-0003zj-T2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7q-0003zP-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7k-0004X4-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:17 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7k-0004X0-Pm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7j-0001lt-O6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7e-0004Vz-Qj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:15 -0400 Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:44431 helo=jocasta.intra) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ajW7e-0004Uc-IZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:06:10 -0400 Received: from jocasta.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jocasta.intra (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id u2PI61T4024414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:06:01 +0100 Received: (from john@localhost) by jocasta.intra (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id u2PI60FC024262 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:06:00 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:06:00 +0100 From: John Darrington To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: value of _CS_PATH\ Message-ID: <20160325180600.GA20217@jocasta.intra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would it not be correct for guix to have=20 confstr (_CS_PATH, buf, len); set the contents of buf with the bin directory of the currently=20 installed coreutils package? For me, it returns /bin:/usr/bin which is not correct. J' =20 --=20 Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlb1fggACgkQimdxnC3oJ7MJwgCeIYBE1NKxHgtSZHgIry++EK6q xYMAnA9FXfA2p6izTK6ZWhtIi1vIwLBl =yAax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--