From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 05 03:56:30 2016 Received: (at 22883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2016 07:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Sv8-0001xi-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 03:56:30 -0400 Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com ([217.69.77.222]:35610) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Sv5-0001xW-Ji for 22883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 03:56:29 -0400 Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1b9Sv4-0002JW-5c for <22883@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:56:26 +0200 Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1b9SqX-00018G-CX; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:51:45 +0200 From: Werner Koch To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#22883: Trustable "guix pull" References: <87io14sqoa.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87fustj59o.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <874m98vbcg.fsf@gnu.org> Organisation: g10 Code GmbH X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367 Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:51:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874m98vbcg.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 05 Jun 2016 00:27:27 +0200") Message-ID: <877fe4hy3y.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22883 Cc: 22883@debbugs.gnu.org, Justus Winter , neal@walfield.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 00:27, ludo@gnu.org said: > cannot or shouldn=E2=80=99t try to guess what=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cbest=E2= =80=9D, IMO. So in this case, > we keep the default names, =E2=80=98gpg2=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98gpgv2=E2= =80=99. > > Do you think we should rename those files? Given that Guix is a new distro you should really try to get rid of 1.4 and only use 2.1. For Windows we use the name "gpg" for a long time now and there is a configure option --enable-gpg2-is-gpg to make it easier. > We sign commits and it=E2=80=99s wonderful; now all we need is tools to a= ctually > use those signatures to authenticate checkouts. :-) Right - Although I sign my commits,e other GnuPG hackers don't do it, and thus for me there is no strong need to verify the commits. But we should have these tools. Shalom-Salam, Werner --=20 Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. /* EFH in Erkrath: https://alt-hochdahl.de/haus */