From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 04 07:22:01 2016 Received: (at 22587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2016 11:22:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b99eT-0000EH-8i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 07:22:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52099) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b99eS-0000E5-ND for 22587@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 07:22:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b99eI-0006hu-Oa for 22587@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 07:21:55 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b99eI-0006hk-LO; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 07:21:50 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:46136 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b99eG-0001wa-D5; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 07:21:48 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Alex Kost Subject: Re: bug#22587: =?utf-8?B?4oCYZ3VpeCBlZGl04oCZ?= & =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98M-x?= guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change References: <8737t4jt1j.fsf@gmail.com> <87oabrr460.fsf@gmail.com> <87twlj6op5.fsf@gmail.com> <878u0bia77.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9ey95mt.fsf@gnu.org> <87y48ahuza.fsf@gmail.com> <8760vd7tzs.fsf@gnu.org> <87ega07nl1.fsf@gmail.com> <87shygthz8.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg9z9rek.fsf@gmail.com> <87porz2xc4.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3ce9jrr.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 Prairial an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 13:21:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r3ce9jrr.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Fri, 03 Jun 2016 22:04:08 +0300") Message-ID: <87shwt19o5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22587 Cc: 22587@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-06-02 22:40 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-04-20 18:31 +0300) wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>>>> However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the >>>>>> solution, and (2) =E2=80=98guix edit=E2=80=99 does what it says IMO,= even if it can >>>>>> occasionally stumble upon read-only files. >>>>> >>>>> OK, well I don't know what to do with it then. What about the follow= ing >>>>> title: =C2=AB"guix edit" name may be confusing=C2=BB? >>>> >>>> Perfect! :-) >>> >>> Done. >> >> I=E2=80=99m rather inclined to close this bug as =E2=80=98wontfix=E2=80= =99. Thoughts? > > I would prefer it to be solved by renaming "guix edit" to "guix package > definition", but I think it will not be welcomed by most users and > authors, so 'wontfix' is fine by me. I=E2=80=99m of course unsure what =E2=80=9Cmost=E2=80=9D users would think,= but I find =E2=80=98guix package definition=E2=80=99 too wordy and probably too hard to find for a newcomer. OK, marking it as wontfix, and we can always revisit the issue later if people disagree! Ludo=E2=80=99.