From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 19 06:50:27 2016 Received: (at 22587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2016 10:50:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1asTEh-0008CP-74 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:50:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53148) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1asTEg-0008C5-G2 for 22587@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:50:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asTEY-0005qY-2s for 22587@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:50:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asTEX-0005qU-WB; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:50:18 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:49286 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1asTEX-000270-5q; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:50:17 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Alex Kost Subject: Re: bug#22587: =?utf-8?B?4oCYZ3VpeCBlZGl04oCZ?= & =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98M-x?= guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change References: <8737t4jt1j.fsf@gmail.com> <87oabrr460.fsf@gmail.com> <87twlj6op5.fsf@gmail.com> <878u0bia77.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9ey95mt.fsf@gnu.org> <87y48ahuza.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 1 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:50:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y48ahuza.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:18:49 +0300") Message-ID: <8760vd7tzs.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22587 Cc: 22587@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: > >> It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a >> purpose, or something. >> >> Could you retitle it, or close it, or fix it, whichever is appropriate? >> :-) > > Was it for me? =E2=80=98To whom it may concern=E2=80=99. :-) > I think the main purpose of this report was to tell us that "edit" > name is confusing. So I would retitle it to "Rename 'guix edit' as it > is confusing". But I don't know how; can it be done by sending some > control message? Yes, using the =E2=80=98retitle=E2=80=99 command, described somewhere at . However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the solution, and (2) =E2=80=98guix edit=E2=80=99 does what it says IMO, even i= f it can occasionally stumble upon read-only files. Ludo=E2=80=99.