From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 09 20:57:26 2016 Received: (at 22571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2016 01:57:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK21-0007AX-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:57:26 -0500 Received: from mail.mordocai.net ([52.33.237.58]:43951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK20-0007AL-KC for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:57:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mordocai.net; s=key; h=Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; bh=7IdRGxEPrUG5oFfYyYfi2RFtXGI+gLN97PLvVJxLPrc=; b=klLs7nwNgN3WZdYOnOwdxCLbJJBbiAgpW/gL9rRx//dZhddanng2GVB0RC3+8J6FqvUW1HA0rtwM+FY0kU0f5OZ6DGeuBvlG6KlJfqM7qoNtrNrL3vRv+OnfJpG/pRQd6ejufz3f9kl+UHW5MkCq/Ij2ssDi4IE1jrRW5XAEv3Q=; Received: from 97-88-111-154.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com ([97.88.111.154] helo=mordocai-desktop) by mail.mordocai.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTK1l-0000eG-Jr for 22571@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 01:57:09 +0000 From: Christopher W Carpenter To: 22571@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87y4aycs21.fsf@mordocai.net> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:57:11 -0600 In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Sat, 06 Feb 2016 05:45:02 +0000") Message-ID: <878u2tpbt4.fsf@mordocai.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_score_int: -9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.mordocai.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP No description available. X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.88.111.154 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mordocai@mordocai.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.mordocai.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: bug#22571: Acknowledgement (Guix on Debian Testing sbcl package needs warning to set SBCL_HOME) X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.mordocai.net) X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22571 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I found the problem, and this can be closed IMHO. I use StumpWM, which is written in common lisp and I use sbcl to run it. It appears that when the stumpwm image is created the SBCL_HOME environment variable's state at that time is stored. In addition, for whatever reason, any processes started from stumpwm will have a SBCL_HOME environment variable with that same value. Therefore, my issue was that my stumpwm that was starting my processes(and the processess themselves) had an old, incorrect value for SBCL_HOME which would then cause this error. Interesting "bug" to find! Thanks for the help! Christopher Carpenter --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWupj3AAoJEFJw6mniKuelQp4P/0ZazgFu9smWrUWEwoUZghXC 1CBbHRSOevS4BRlTt/IEPcWl93lEHcjmpmGfq20ynQMw1q1oL2yK1wydZ+7gWcHL sYiRLA2gt1k5ksuTCryT9wrtskTG6OSoLOq5gWj3eI7bC8QPyi2qt40RuHNcMxch RD152Ku1iFXjbZV8AL4H2AVvEwiQ7F5jgt55omYnqo3+KI82kdtkjodqb/LciSIj bFkQFDj0jsS0r19diyIQ1OQnX0FA7gVuYoa7cb3lXiLzxhRFj4BxF6sI7ckyYyID ZSyZkfX0xnPaljg9Fhm6h/DBuXJfNW0GwuA/iisOoLgPjqF/8GEPpAu6RLWkp8bc pqLDu61f30Rus8VassBnbkBDcw0x4zPvDQf09ClOBrcCDWI5v2sZIsgmFXIeaSBk g01NTcx729XrJqfVCgpuFbNrZtS6TuMVsk+uoGpfrPcZ0kQZ5nre0FnDYe5BEpS7 K3aoCnMYU61F2ifLHmrIXU6spal0cvu9SjPGA8S1Z9cPWgPPFOxJVGTLYEq0l7qJ ZoXQofX9PWMhdt4Q+VFmZTLTzKw6U5bfhLfEnE8CvLfi6iwvrF6Kw6NoTuYgOJ0Y EJSU5j8+LfqfWq61tjY42aBwe9rw/nxjAR0Gw89YXCkZyhFh1isXz/Fq3ZRhxVCV JpWP7ExGH9cg2bLPL684 =rsLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--