From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 05 17:31:01 2016 Received: (at 22304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2016 22:31:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGa84-0004Kp-TP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:31:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGa83-0004Kb-Kq for 22304@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:30:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGa7v-00007N-Dt for 22304@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:30:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGa7v-00007J-B7; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:30:51 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:37832 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aGa7u-0000r0-KU; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:30:51 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#22304: Build for Julia is not reproducible References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 23:30:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:28:42 +0100") Message-ID: <8760z7k6av.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22304 Cc: 22304@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > When building =E2=80=9Cjulia=E2=80=9D twice we get different binaries for > > $out/lib/julia/sys.so > > and > > $out/lib/julia/sys-debug.so Apparently there=E2=80=99s no __DATE__ and __TIME__ in the C code. I would check if the order of object files on the command line that links those shared objects is always the same. Ludo=E2=80=99.