From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 28 10:21:05 2015 Received: (at 21142) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2015 14:21:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK5ke-0006JI-J9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:21:04 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:41669) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK5kc-0006J5-4y for 21142@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:21:02 -0400 Received: from [10.1.10.104] (helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK5kT-0001TH-CX; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:20:53 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Claes Wallin (=?utf-8?B?6Z+L5ZiJ6Kqg?=) Subject: Re: bug#21142: Sshfs-fuse requires fuse References: <20150727150532.GA18963@debian> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:20:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: ("Claes Wallin \=\?utf-8\?B\?KOmfi+WYieiqoCkiJ3M\=\?\= message of "Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:23:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87wpxk2wjh.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21142 Cc: Andreas Enge , 21142@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Claes Wallin (=E9=9F=8B=E5=98=89=E8=AA=A0) = writes: > On 27-Jul-2015 5:06 pm, "Andreas Enge" wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> when trying to execute sshfs from the sshfs-fuse package, I obtain >> fuse: failed to exec fusermount: No such file or directory >> >> I think that fuse should be a propagated input of sshfs-fuse. > > Maybe it's less intrusive toward the user to wrap sshfs to add fuse to > its PATH? Or patch the reference to 'fusermount' to be an absolute path? I haven't looked into this, so I don't know the feasibility of these approaches, but in general I think that 'propagated-inputs' should be avoided whenever there is a reasonable alternative. What do you think? Mark