From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 16 09:44:13 2016 Received: (at 20433) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2016 14:44:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aKS5N-0000TX-2K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:44:13 -0500 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aKS5L-0000TL-3u for 20433@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:44:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (x4d0cec56.dyn.telefonica.de [77.12.236.86]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1452955441815924.8580805039795; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 06:44:01 -0800 (PST) References: <877fknsot2.fsf@gnu.org> <874meh4kx3.fsf@gnu.org> <87egdkbj5k.fsf@tsyesika.se> <87pox4v62m.fsf@gnu.org> <87twmgjm1j.fsf@tsyesika.se> <87egdi36ug.fsf@elephly.net> <87vb6tbpca.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#20433: Keyboard not working on laptop with guixSD In-reply-to: <87vb6tbpca.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:43:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn8l37pu.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20433 Cc: Jessica Tallon , 20433@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> So, using HIDBP is probably wrong and might very well be the cause. >> Looking at the module names again I searched the logs for “usbkbd” and, >> yes, the GuixSD logs contain this line: >> >> usbcore: registered new interface driver usbkbd > > Do you think we should remove usbkbd from (gnu system linux-initrd)? > Is there another module we should load instead? I don’t know why one would want to use “usbkbd” and thus HIDBP. As far as I understand “usbhid” should be sufficient. ~~ Ricardo