宋文武 skribis: >> [...] >>> >>> The idea to generate profile from search-paths is not new, >>> I heard it from you IIRC. >>> I think it's the time to do it. >> >> Agreed, the plan makes sense and I think we have all the bits. >> >> A related question is whether to encode search path environment >> variables into the manifest (currently they are “guessed” by looking at >> same-named packages; see (guix build package).) I think that would >> probably simplify things and make it easier to share this environment >> variable code. >> >> Thoughts? > I see, currently search-paths depends on the packages recipes. If we > update the related scheme code, then search-paths got updated, even we > didn't touch packages in profile at all. It's a little confusing. > So I think we should encode the search-paths for each package in > manifest. Done in dedb17a. That will make it easier to generate environment variable settings. Ludo’.