Evaluations of the ‘guix’ jobset failing on ci.guix

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
One participant
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Ludovic Courtès
Severity
normal
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 29 Nov 17:58 +0100
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
871pyuyo2s.fsf@inria.fr
Evaluations of the ‘guix’ jobset have been failing on ci.guix when
computing the derivation for aarch64-linux.

369d2698b0bfc3726f8e6d232d43d0dda832225f):

Toggle snippet (18 lines)
[ 28/ 30] compiling... 86.7% of 15 files
[ 29/ 30] compiling... 93.3% of 15 files
[ 30/ 30] compiling... 100.0% of 15 files
retrieving 1 store item from '141.80.167.181'...
importing file or directory '/gnu/store/cfpvmda7klp0f5ywxkl2nagghkz7zvbi-guix-cli-core'...
found valid signature for '/gnu/store/cfpvmda7klp0f5ywxkl2nagghkz7zvbi-guix-cli-core'

.[Kregistering 1 items ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
.[Kregistering 1 items
done with offloaded '/gnu/store/5nkhf15ma6c4lfindr4xp56ldcqvy4qi-guix-cli-core.drv'
building path(s) `/gnu/store/wbhwdxg03n4cc01wm6aib5w0lw3p0rm4-guix-cli-core-modules'
Registering builds for evaluation 1856888.
Registering builds for evaluation 1856888.
Registering builds for evaluation 1856888.
In thread:
uncaught throw to %exception: (#<&inferior-exception arguments: (%exception #<inferior-object #<&message message: "You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/v48zc2lbx5c5726wzljp29rnrw1851li-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: \"369d2698b0bfc3726f8e6d232d43d0dda832225f\"; system: \"aarch64-linux\";\nhost version: \"369d2698b0bfc3726f8e6d232d43d0dda832225f\"; pull-version: 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.\n">>) inferior: #<inferior pipe (0 1 1) 7ff1a5114f40> stack: ((#f ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1779 13)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1682 16)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1684 16)) (#f ("ice-9/eval.scm" 190 27)) (run-with-store ("guix/store.scm" 2209 25)) (#f ("gnu/ci.scm" 241 16)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 585 17)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 585 17)) (append-map ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 672 15)) (cuirass-jobs ("gnu/ci.scm" 516 4)) (#f ("ice-9/eval.scm" 158 9)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1751 10)) (call-with-prompt ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 723 2)) (#f (#f #f #f)) (#f ("guix/repl.scm" 98 21)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1751 10)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1746 15)) (#f ("guix/repl.scm" 125 7)))>)

The first failure was apparently https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/1853560
(commit 0376420e8785204effa56cbbdd91ad425fbdff18); previous one was
cd26d76fedb7ab13ad91bd5dcfce119892b8e62e).

Somehow the corresponding ‘cuirass evaluate’ process hangs, using one
(out of 8) concurrent evaluation slots of ‘cuirass register’, and thus
delaying other evaluations.

Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 3 Dec 15:29 +0100
(address . 74607@debbugs.gnu.org)
87y10wyh49.fsf@gnu.org
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Evaluations of the ‘guix’ jobset have been failing on ci.guix when
> computing the derivation for aarch64-linux.

I’ve temporarily disabled aarch64-linux for this jobset, which does
indeed work around the problem:


Ludo’.
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 74607@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 74607
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch