Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote 6 months ago
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
Hi,
While debugging an unrelated reproducibility issue with an older mtools
version I got the idea of testing packages that uses mtools (with the
current Guix version) and it turn out not to be reproductible:
$ guix challenge syslinux
/gnu/store/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93
contents differ: no local build for
'/gnu/store/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93' https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93:168p4cykfvjklsjpchppgbrlv2yfj34734xzmc1nfjnr527n5nas
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93:0d6v9jv6wbnir9hm6lkfs9lk1c0harq9dvxlhanbm7rzn5mrrfxw
differing files:
/bin/syslinux
/sbin/extlinux
/share/syslinux/isolinux-debug.bin
/share/syslinux/isolinux.bin
/share/syslinux/lpxelinux.0
/share/syslinux/memdisk
/share/syslinux/pxelinux.0
/share/syslinux/sysdump.c32
/share/syslinux/syslinux.com
1 store items were analyzed:
- 0 (0.0%) were identical
- 1 (100.0%) differed
- 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
Here's my Guix version:
$ guix describe
Generation 84 Sep 14 2024 15:08:03 (current)
guix 9c88f21
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: 9c88f217bec9efeda02f934626a5da14014c2ab7
[gnutoo@primary_laptop(guix) guix]$ guix challenge syslinux
/gnu/store/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93
contents differ: no local build for
'/gnu/store/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93' https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93:168p4cykfvjklsjpchppgbrlv2yfj34734xzmc1nfjnr527n5nas
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9gq6bgralqfd1yzkywnr8pkx5il5s99c-syslinux-6.04-pre-1.bb41e93:0d6v9jv6wbnir9hm6lkfs9lk1c0harq9dvxlhanbm7rzn5mrrfxw
differing files:
/bin/syslinux
/sbin/extlinux
/share/syslinux/isolinux-debug.bin
/share/syslinux/isolinux.bin
/share/syslinux/lpxelinux.0
/share/syslinux/memdisk
/share/syslinux/pxelinux.0
/share/syslinux/sysdump.c32
/share/syslinux/syslinux.com
1 store items were analyzed:
- 0 (0.0%) were identical
- 1 (100.0%) differed
- 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
I'm unsure if it has the same issue I'm struggling with or not (FAT12
and maybe FAT32 as well store last access date (without the time) so
it's easy to mess up testing).
Denis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=hPx/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----