[PATCH] guix: gexp: Export gexp-inputs.

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • jgart
  • Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
jgart
Severity
normal
J
J
jgart wrote on 17 Jan 2022 23:55
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . jgart)(address . jgart@dismail.de)
20220117225516.21249-1-jgart@dismail.de
* guix/gexp.scm (gexp-inputs): Export gexp-inputs variable.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Toggle diff (14 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index 01dca902f7..bdcac652a8 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ (define-module (guix gexp)
gexp-input
gexp-input?
+ gexp-inputs
gexp-input-thing
gexp-input-output
gexp-input-native?
--
2.34.1
J
J
jgart wrote on 18 Jan 2022 00:19
(no subject)
(address . 53330@debbugs.gnu.org)
20220117181908.GB22541@gac.attlocal.net
Hi Guixers, wdyt?

gexp-inputs can be a useful function that can be part of the
public interface. Why might this be a good/bad idea?

I can send a patch for gexp-outputs if it makes sense to do so also.

all best,

jgart
J
J
jgart wrote on 18 Jan 2022 00:26
(address . 53330@debbugs.gnu.org)
20220117182639.GB22898@gac.attlocal.net
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:19:08 -0500 jgart <jgart@dismail.de> wrote:
Toggle quote (11 lines)
> Hi Guixers, wdyt?
>
> gexp-inputs can be a useful function that can be part of the
> public interface. Why might this be a good/bad idea?
>
> I can send a patch for gexp-outputs if it makes sense to do so also.
>
> all best,
>
> jgart

close 53330

?civodul?: jgart: i'd rather not expose gexp internals
?01/17/2022 | 06:21:27 PM ?civodul?: there's lower-gexp if you really need something low-level
T
T
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote on 18 Jan 2022 03:45
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87y23d4v9a.fsf@nckx
close 53330
J
J
jgart wrote on 18 Jan 2022 04:12
close 53330
(address . 53330@debbugs.gnu.org)(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)
20220117221254.GB31948@gac.attlocal.net
Doxxed!

Thanks!

jgart
?