RRon Nazarov wrote on 3 Jun 2021 00:01Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)Message-ID:c5a08ee656f2d999dfa84e5f7469a60183dcec40.camel@disroot.orgGuix contains font-ubuntu, which is licensed under the Ubuntu FontLicense v1.0, which has not been approved by the FSF, and is considerednonfree by Debian and Fedora, according to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(typeface)#Ubuntu_Font_Licence.
LLeo Prikler wrote on 3 Jun 2021 08:41Recipients:(address . 48802@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . noisytoot@disroot.org)Message-ID:a34f16bd53fe6cf6b4fcd296872e1bd341cac1d7.camel@student.tugraz.atI've pushed a923127d3051841e4187ee5e817f6c85e6387c3e, which drops thisfont, but I missed that openshot has font-ubuntu as input. I'll try tomake it build with font-dejavu instead. Wish me luck!
LLeo Prikler wrote on 3 Jun 2021 08:53Recipients:(address . 48802-done@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . noisytoot@disroot.org)Message-ID:67aaab511cc2b1af7d9fa122704b237deb7d60d4.camel@student.tugraz.atAm Donnerstag, den 03.06.2021, 08:41 +0200 schrieb Leo Prikler:Toggle quote (5 lines)> I've pushed a923127d3051841e4187ee5e817f6c85e6387c3e, which drops> this> font, but I missed that openshot has font-ubuntu as input. I'll try> to> make it build with font-dejavu instead. Wish me luck!Aaaand it's fixed. Please pardon my blunder, Guix should pull now :)
Your commentThis issue is archived.To comment on this conversation send an email to 48802@debbugs.gnu.org