trilinos source vanished

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Efraim Flashner
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Efraim Flashner
Severity
normal
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 15 Sep 2020 21:24
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20200915192409.GA19874@E5400
The source page for trilinos (gnu packages engineering) now points to a
Github page and the previous tarballs no longer seem to be available.
There's a content addressed substitute available from Berlin but I don't
see an original tarball from Debian to point to.


--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=lxm0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 16 Sep 2020 00:37
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)(address . 43432@debbugs.gnu.org)
86d02mzmwz.fsf@gmail.com
Hi,

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 22:24, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
Toggle quote (5 lines)
> The source page for trilinos (gnu packages engineering) now points to a
> Github page and the previous tarballs no longer seem to be available.
> There's a content addressed substitute available from Berlin but I don't
> see an original tarball from Debian to point to.

Ouch!

Well, Github delivers this tarball:


but yes, the hash does not match (guix download). Does it matter? Is
it not possible to replace the vanished tarball by this one?


And it seems better to switch to git-fetch with commit. Some arguments
are exposed in this thread:


BTW, since the Tarball Heritage is not ready yet, currently the easiest
is to use ’git-fetch’, via “guix lint” to queue to SWH and with the
right content-address, the fallback works.


All the best,
simon
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 16 Sep 2020 09:09
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 43432@debbugs.gnu.org)
20200916070907.GD19874@E5400
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:37:48AM +0200, zimoun wrote:
Toggle quote (17 lines)
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 22:24, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
> > The source page for trilinos (gnu packages engineering) now points to a
> > Github page and the previous tarballs no longer seem to be available.
> > There's a content addressed substitute available from Berlin but I don't
> > see an original tarball from Debian to point to.
>
> Ouch!
>
> Well, Github delivers this tarball:
>
> <https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos/archive/trilinos-release-12-12-1.tar.gz>
>
> but yes, the hash does not match (guix download). Does it matter? Is
> it not possible to replace the vanished tarball by this one?

That's one of the autogenerated tarballs, so it wouldn't work in any
case.

Toggle quote (13 lines)
> And it seems better to switch to git-fetch with commit. Some arguments
> are exposed in this thread:
>
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-05/msg00224.html>
>
> BTW, since the Tarball Heritage is not ready yet, currently the easiest
> is to use ’git-fetch’, via “guix lint” to queue to SWH and with the
> right content-address, the fallback works.
>
>
> All the best,
> simon

I think it might be better to see about updating it to a newer version
and switch it to git-fetch at the same time.

--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=CAP7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 18 Oct 2022 17:38
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)(address . 43432@debbugs.gnu.org)
86fsflywe7.fsf@gmail.com
Hi,

I think it is a duplicate of #40074 [1]. I am in favour to close both.



Cheers,
simon
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 18 Oct 2022 18:23
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 43432@debbugs.gnu.org)
505CCA63-A4BF-430C-B066-69B5CEBAE7F1@flashner.co.il
On October 18, 2022 3:38:40 PM UTC, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
Toggle quote (10 lines)
>Hi,
>
>I think it is a duplicate of #40074 [1]. I am in favour to close both.
>
>1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40074>
>
>
>Cheers,
>simon

Works for me
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 19 Oct 2022 12:38
control message for bug #43432
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
8635bkp07p.fsf@gmail.com
close 43432
quit
?