Hi,
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (5 lines)
> The build farm is having trouble building Guix for i686-linux. In fact,
> it hasn't successfully completed the 'guix' job in weeks:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53463
(This issue title doesn’t mention i686.) I’m looking at it, though a
bit slowly because I’ve been busy with other things:
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> And building the guix package does not work on aarch64, also for weeks:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52943
Ah, I thought this had been fixed with Chris Marusich’s commits but
apparently not?
Toggle quote (5 lines)
> Finally, should we consider retiring the armhf port in 1.4.0? It seems
> that we have stopped trying to build for it:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=guix+spec%3Amaster+system%3Aarmhf-linux
The “armhf-linux” box was unchecked, not sure why. I’ve re-added it and
we’ll see. (For the record, anyone with access to berlin or with a
certificate can do it via the Cuirass web interface.)
Bordeaux.guix does have binaries:
Toggle snippet (27 lines)
$ guix weather -s armhf-linux coreutils guile grep sed
computing 4 package derivations for armhf-linux...
looking for 6 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
https://ci.guix.gnu.org
0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 6)
unknown substitute sizes
0.0 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
0.042 seconds per request (0.2 seconds in total)
23.6 requests per second
0.0% (0 out of 6) of the missing items are queued
at least 1,000 queued builds
aarch64-linux: 1000 (100.0%)
build rate: 17.64 builds per hour
i686-linux: 4.74 builds per hour
x86_64-linux: 9.23 builds per hour
powerpc64le-linux: 3.69 builds per hour
looking for 6 store items on https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org...
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org
100.0% substitutes available (6 out of 6)
23.1 MiB of nars (compressed)
113.8 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
0.034 seconds per request (0.1 seconds in total)
29.3 requests per second
(continuous integration information unavailable)
Overall it’s not a great situation to be in, but I think we should be
able to address it. Usually I think it’s safer to merge ‘core-updates’
only after “make assert-binaries-available” passes.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
