From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 14 13:38:55 2021 Received: (at 50077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2021 17:38:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQCOV-00061r-H8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:38:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:35612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQCOT-00061g-ML for 50077@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 13:38:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id i23so21560233wrb.2 for <50077@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:38:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QvHRupWKsQs6SbCasWCZTQEvRggtizrCVcPTFF+YkAc=; b=DEY8YlrieIhu0tLlIPUUrsUIKoQ517xXqO6jyAjjivHbAENlcTkIa5OPm/VYGdIinD KeWtQlrT7zFBimVMC0tak2xTmlWFFkF4FUKLSvRUra9VV8IrWPgJWtIe3QsaQYbwy8B4 GFwIKhkSQwQVGzQBjbBMJtOWP9Qa/co7g2F31GPjtSZrkCO/85yCEsw7oJO7VpbXGtMe HstYqDqs/gL+5QMkTeHeCJGv0e0gUAa4+i/XlBUo8oQXcXNwAp9c1+vu4iVQD8fKWtZq ks5yzGsiC1r+bGl/chT3Al3RkRyUz6k1wmJLlByKTPbu74SsXeE+mifx7zLQMjtJ3UHB 2g9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QvHRupWKsQs6SbCasWCZTQEvRggtizrCVcPTFF+YkAc=; b=NyYLvpqzKWtgTuMInQ/lfEkPhd/jsMALjpx1EawlMvRFvo/KpQc32nYuvkmIjAy8Vu Do427iuHmp1r+IiDuD8C0q2CBiW5OjlHacvgDYFY1zlLM7gQQYZ/X1WoPUu/1KrvJjp5 Saw9Dqo2e+k0+9kacXTBR+fB5TQ2Xj8QztGUoQFD5XaIPLNHIcLvfRzumnGqzM0tBa0R zkyNe/V+5oobIIoL4bkpdJrkgx+bM2cPaENAWnAbLaVkarhk8+aCXYkOVh/udvDusZTN NZlCuCbrA3Vgizdd4pzyPktpQy8I9f+cWj73aoOdS59flwSR0V9smWqGeWUUTjsGbp3O fyGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530J7MrcWVFiPP8FmfHn115kzkyIDUgQwe8zsa5V+ApUj2AsZHEq CFAos19LP228dnsBUzb6ptcZWGf3reR2+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxApKt1W1m9PiJEvAN3M7qu5sx5XhBfpJnE05X59GUXRMmrjZST4sxrRX4q6S/DaEJPhct15w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e684:: with SMTP id r4mr361756wrm.229.1631641127870; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-43.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr. [194.254.61.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm1973353wrz.39.2021.09.14.10.38.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Xinglu Chen , Andrew Tropin , 50077@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#50077] [PATCH v2 3/3] gnu: Add emacs-notmuch. In-Reply-To: <87lf3ztbta.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> References: <878rzzmxir.fsf@trop.in> <87lf3ztbta.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:35:45 +0200 Message-ID: <861r5rtbji.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 at 17:29, Xinglu Chen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote: >> On 2021-09-04 11:42, Xinglu Chen wrote: >> Not sure if we need to hardcode the path to notmuch binary (some people >> can use guix for managing emacs packages, but not system), but I think >> it's a rare case and this default is reasonable [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.46 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50077 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 at 17:29, Xinglu Chen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote: >> On 2021-09-04 11:42, Xinglu Chen wrote: >> Not sure if we need to hardcode the path to notmuch binary (some people >> can use guix for managing emacs packages, but not system), but I think >> it's a rare case and this default is reasonable and easily fixable by >> simple `(setq notmuch-command "notmuch")` in the cases, when notmuch >> itslef provided by other package manager. > > Yeah, this default should work for most people, and as you said, people > who haven=E2=80=99t installed Notmuch via Guix can just set to the > =E2=80=98notmuch-command=E2=80=99 to the appropriate value. It=E2=80=99s= Emacs after all... ;-) > > Also, since there was a consensus that Emacs packages that were included > in =E2=80=9Cregular=E2=80=9D packages should be packaged as separate =E2= =80=98emacs-=E2=80=99 packages, > I think it would be a good idea to add a paragraph about that in the > manual. I agree. For references, this question appears here: so it seems something is missing in the manual. :-) All the best, simon