From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 23 18:05:49 2021 Received: (at 46706-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2021 23:05:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60880 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEgkW-0003L8-VG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:05:49 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:35208 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEgkU-0003Kz-SI for 46706-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:05:47 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu.fritz.box (p57b5215e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.181.33.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2183B3FCE9; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:05:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:05:44 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#46706: asciidoc 8.6.10: source hash mismatch Message-ID: <20210224000544.255aed83@alma-ubu.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: References: <20210222180309.20924b05@alma-ubu.fritz.box> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/=XcFpKlQym0NeJSUL9e+qg3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46706-done Cc: 46706-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/=XcFpKlQym0NeJSUL9e+qg3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:10:44 -0500 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:03:09PM +0100, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > > Note: we also have asciidoc@9.0.1 (package asciidoc-py3). It might > > be possible to use v9 instead of the old asciidoc@8? > >=20 > > Bj=C3=B6rn > >=20 > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix build -S asciidoc --no-substitutes > >=20 > > [..] > >=20 > > r:sha256 hash mismatch > > for /gnu/store/925a6d936ihbqc7vaf9qkim4f4myjm0r-asciidoc-8.6.10-checkou= t: > > expected hash: 1hrqkgjmp1gq3f9rkbr8l0y62fzvwb9n8ys35s25bg2ld04y4g4y > > actual hash: 1wwxm789iqanqfabbhm29vma0cfv0kp02srkxhi6vyr752m8i3mg > > hash mismatch for store item > > '/gnu/store/925a6d936ihbqc7vaf9qkim4f4myjm0r-asciidoc-8.6.10-checkout' = =20 >=20 > For comparison, I've attached a tarball that unpacks the "expected" > source checkout. Hi Leo, thanks for this package. This information was quite useful when diffing. This is "interesting": We referenced the git-checkout not by commit, but by version-tag. They redirected the repository to=20 https://github.com/asciidoc-py/asciidoc-py And they rewrote the old commits (!) to use python3. The "original" Python2 version is here: https://github.com/asciidoc-py/asciidoc-py2 Fixed with commit 53c40b3c77492740458a7b52723128c12c53d55b Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/=XcFpKlQym0NeJSUL9e+qg3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EAREKAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCYDWKSAAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /daaAKCvdZokIHNgZZ6ascoXECqwyNRV8wCeOjnE+p7aOcbvNaLvirp9EKfA8S8= =4FoR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=XcFpKlQym0NeJSUL9e+qg3--