On +2020-10-15 11:47:30 +0200, zimoun wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:53, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > I don’t think it’s a reasonable response: it’s a fact that we naturally > > tend to read manuals sparsely, at best. > > > > Since the pastes vanished, how did ‘sudo guix pull’ lead to incompatible > > bytecode warnings? > > If I remember correctly (which is neither a reasonable response :-)), it > should highly come from the user config. And the investigation needs > more information, e.g., as Tobias asks: the output of: > > $ type guix > $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/current > $ sudo rm ~/.config/guix/current > $ /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix pull > $ hash guix > $ type guix > > All the best, > simon > If there is a left-over from old manual installation advice like --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /usr/local/bin/guix: symbolic link to /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix/bin/guix --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- could it interfere in any way with the above, or subsequent operation? -- Regards, Bengt Richter