From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 02 03:00:39 2020 Received: (at 42148) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2020 07:00:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jqtD5-0003ue-KK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 03:00:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jqtD3-0003uN-DW for 42148@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 03:00:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqtCw-0007m5-27; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 03:00:30 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:fa:a50:283e:a3be:73a1:d0e2] (port=35240 helo=meru) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jqtCv-0005SX-L1; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 03:00:29 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#42148: guix-1.1.0-13.26611f5 fails to build References: <87y2o3zp7n.fsf@gnu.org> <87a70iyjf8.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:00:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a70iyjf8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 02 Jul 2020 00:11:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87366ae705.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 42148 Cc: 42148@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey! > [ 5%] LOAD guix/glob.scm > [ 6%] LOAD guix/workers.scm > [ 7%] LOAD guix/zlib.scm > [ 7%] LOAD guix/build-system.scm > [ 8%] LOAD guix/build-system/android-ndk.scm > > I suspect that weird timestamp issue could well explain many things. Oh good catch, I didn't notice it. All build machines seem to have a sane "date" output, but I guess the issue is probably trickier. For now, I'll make a new Guix update to trigger a new rebuild and try to find the guilty machine in parallel. Thanks, Mathieu