From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 18 08:46:49 2020 Received: (at 41880-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2020 12:46:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jltwO-0000L0-W9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:46:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jltwN-0000Kp-RX for 41880-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:46:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jltwI-00075C-EO; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:46:42 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60140 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jltwH-0005i6-KU; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:46:42 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Martin Becze Subject: Re: [bug#41880] [PATCH] gnu: go-ipfs: Update to 0.5.1. References: <20200615201140.24235-1-mjbecze@riseup.net> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:46:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200615201140.24235-1-mjbecze@riseup.net> (Martin Becze's message of "Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:11:39 -0500") Message-ID: <87mu50lexc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41880-done Cc: 41880-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Martin, Martin Becze skribis: > * gnu/packages/ipfs.scm (go-ipfs): Update to 0.5.1 Applied! Michael Rohleder skribis: > afaik, this version doesn't support http POST anymore. > Maybe this could break things in the ipfs branches? Good to know. We=E2=80=99ll have to adjust the code there; that shouldn=E2= =80=99t prevent us from updating the package in the meantime IMO. Martin Becze skribis: > Whats in the ipfs branch? I'm down to test, if I know what to test. It=E2=80=99s at , but don=E2=80=99t worr= y about it. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.