From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 14 06:42:37 2020 Received: (at 41813) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2020 10:42:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42953 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jkQ61-0006Or-MV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 06:42:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41198) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jkQ5z-0006Ob-Jw for 41813@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 06:42:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkQ5t-0006Ud-7p; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 06:42:29 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:fa:a50:d869:cbcf:2456:40cc] (port=36496 helo=meru) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jkQ5s-0007Ip-68; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 06:42:28 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: [bug#41813] [PATCH] gnu: Add bbswitch-module. References: <20200611202423.9284-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <87eeqiklmu.fsf@gnu.org> <87a716nds0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:42:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a716nds0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:27:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1uij5d9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41813 Cc: 41813@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean :) Are you saying that I should > mention that it could potentially work with any brand in the future? > Considering the age of the last commit, I doubt it ever will :) Yes, mmh, '2013' then I guess you're right. Mathieu