From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 06 11:30:30 2020 Received: (at 41732) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2020 15:30:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhamD-00031G-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 11:30:30 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f52.google.com ([209.85.219.52]:36552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhamB-000313-VY for 41732@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 11:30:29 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f52.google.com with SMTP id x16so566514qvr.3 for <41732@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K9jYEruV/KEpbYl4ToY8Umuas7Lvfj5UjCi75NmsiF0=; b=SwuAzR2ASygzHXvPh/xIBeeHB1iRWbsbRAdsiqZgcJzQ/7Ajhjnobs9bDXwRJIounH ORFbjhQRmWsuyQeQDPCRcbYTv+QDtaftsgBcmzlMqWfE+tzsv3xaZ+M8Ql5BvnIZYwyj 0dsDIP30fmv5I4JuBotllrHXr78u2empb3gKuetg2lsmNjH35BnBzojFTQf6NJPyWbL5 fQiYxAXTfDEYcxvLe3aZ44ODNB4skUgCTHYkYBlC7JiSy7LXE5+WatKTJ6QYkus1KWCb MNy/kofP9IxMqS6L9eO+xQLXVtVKqzs48RMncW5PeUIL6hwm1nddHFOKTyxxaXOoe3Ti z+Qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K9jYEruV/KEpbYl4ToY8Umuas7Lvfj5UjCi75NmsiF0=; b=cH8yRPWR0gzLPxKEXKTdMnhSBp2nWq4wlgeMNxx4SziBw1U8eR/gj6jo27j4Z6WWkh Q2xGpnsiMqubjm9CSjok1ZWoxZlKtwxAkaKZozCanMto/09LUbMaZC1M+YMFSsTIUqmg a4KsbTZpRs6nB9XM/PR0oz99Ny+QFFO8+zsUBY7FUhb2Af60b1LdGBn7OuI0RMarDI/z 6OjJGPDZXMf7iln6MbuArgbtKzLYPY7E/iDRmhBjGYr24ZoZNBRtlbtOg15yxXUKw1sl qTL8XXqyzLLQwOVRDuwCr3WHH+8aEAwiGx9TeggMsaCVj5hclGpvbKzN/otvpKpedSY8 ypwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fcrpa1Ek+aFsPybo9RzYvX3/0uKZq1v3+5N4kAAsNEj4b4pkL Tv/efCzU5bgkS9qGwgerSIYG52ylEr171aT9M2s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwK1HQ3OVd1e/1cR8d7smTU1c3I/8Dkl0w+QByOt4sYJNAGSlScCuldA5zXFgvhIzqQMAREjSb64eYx2TzYc/k= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:54aa:: with SMTP id r10mr14735902qvy.6.1591457422466; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87tuzo8vj6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sgf8ffj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> In-Reply-To: <87sgf8ffj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> From: zimoun Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 17:30:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#41732: issue with emacs-lua-mode and emacs-next To: Nicolas Goaziou Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41732 Cc: 41732@debbugs.gnu.org, Fredrik Salomonsson X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear Nicolas, On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 16:13, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > zimoun writes: > > Somehow, one needs to change the Emacs version used by the Emacs > > toolchain to bytecompile, right? > > I do not know if it makes sense, but we could add something like > > 'package-with-emacs-next' similar to 'package-with-python2' or > > 'package-with-ocam4.07'. > > WDYT? > > This sounds like serious overhead for a single package. Maybe we could > try to prevent byte-compilation for the package and see what happens? Maybe I miss the issue. From my understanding, all the Emacs packages are byte-compiled with the current Emacs. Therefore, "guix install emacs-next emacs-foo" and then "M-x foo" works by luck -- well because the Emacs VM is stable. :-) And I do not know how to rebuild all my Emacs packages using 'emacs-next' instead of the current Emacs. Maybe I miss something. Well, I am not suggesting to duplicate all the Emacs packages with something like 'emacs-next-' because it is too much. I am suggesting to provide 'package-with-emacs-next' and then for example in my manifest file I would use this new procedure to generate on-the-fly these next packages; as an expert Emacs mode. I do not know if this proposal makes sense. Probably not. :-) (My regular Emacs is the current version and I very rarely use emacs-next because I started Emacs with 23 therefore 24 was already a so-nice improvement. :-)) All the best, simon