From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 15 13:44:57 2020 Received: (at 41263-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2020 17:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38678 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOG-0002A3-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:44:57 -0400 Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.18]:12272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZeOF-00029q-UU for 41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 13:44:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:44:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail; t=1589564689; bh=eZdkak3EqLFKffVlZae6ULrSwsxsD/bcfsAFUHRqZRs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ukLT4Bc8kNjvOIVV18GUZGuyM+/DSJpXeyPK8Ouv70LdtuhdR3u4H185P1dBwO8kS P27Lh0YStOfdXULFVWGWG35Gxgz+nhe50gZAouAmZG0YQZRc9eggnPj/pgBc1XHfb7 8ExlLmfnedg77eIYWlKdnQJ/gYgXP9wESRYtjtHk= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: Ekaitz Zarraga Subject: Re: [bug#41263] [PATCH] gnu: Add openctm Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87eerltskn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eerltskn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41263-done Cc: "41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org" <41263-done@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ekaitz Zarraga Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, May 15, 2020 12:12 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > Hi, > > Ekaitz Zarraga ekaitz@elenq.tech skribis: > > > > From 8bbac5bccdb0b2fd5ffa8fe1e2dec25a6a359810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200= 1 > > > From: Ekaitz Zarraga ekaitz@elenq.tech > > > Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:55:32 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openctm > > > > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (openctm): New Variable. > > > > Applied with the cosmetic changes below, mostly indentation (consider > running ./etc/indent-code.el as mentioned in the manual). > > Thanks! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Thanks for the help Ludo (and the motivation!). I was wondering about if it's worth to separate the package in multiple out= puts like: GUI for openctm files, openctm library and so on, as described h= ere: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs.htm= l#Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs It has like a `tools` part and a `lib` part I'd say. Does it make sense for= this package? It would avoid using GTK in the library part I think. I never did this before but looks like an option to reduce the package size= (total: 830.2 MiB reported by guix size O_O). Opinions? Thanks!