From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 13 14:00:07 2020 Received: (at 41190) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2020 18:00:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYvfq-0001SE-Va for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:00:07 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:57638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYvfp-0001PV-9f for 41190@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:00:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [46.237.173.210]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35BA827BBE1; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:00:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id c017e3f4; Wed, 13 May 2020 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) References: <87h7wmpcsk.fsf@cbaines.net> <20200511181656.25849-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20200511181656.25849-2-mail@cbaines.net> <878shyw7yt.fsf@devup.no> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Christopher Baines To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [bug#41190] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: finance: bitcoin-core: Disable a test that spuriously fails. In-reply-to: <878shyw7yt.fsf@devup.no> Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 19:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8qrogv2.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 41190 Cc: 41190@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> * gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-core)[arguments]: Disable a test. > > Uff, I pushed a fix for this in 46bbdef24701db8e61326b0645fd426a17111a11 > that took the upstream patch. > > You are too polite, asking for reviews instead of pushing straight to > master! :-P > > Sorry for the duplicate work. No problem, at least both of us have looked at it, which is sort of like patch review :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl68NaFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XfAIw//fjf8oVuNmU0kb4oUcbXCe9w956sqE/L87pV54GwAfryxnwc4AslOLLhb S6O+V6cM7HpQInZze7EfXyEAQNd5sayEsRnMp72TuhjEDgwloxMru/Q97xG93yTj H/iT8AWdQgEaTSKJqFb9fL7j9YAXLRIy/mFcjcKTcmzVfBU6caADeX2MQUpBaYji aOH7toAyGy5AXphuYNBFb7gJh0nRq3E1s8wSgcnd2TmS69p6N9YY1GVck3obgOt5 1tbrgIAnrY0Bk1iWG4PELdF3lNVhhflWmt76hq6ID3BTHYIULdS8dBfqRqgQ+W20 UybUI9aLMwLvB+9CYDe6DXkch4/zYLPbXlxPOp8OlcdMD7QqSFE23fQVwzB8Xtbh +62MTO5nOozshzbFI1DJpYMbWZDtGp4INm951cT2AqS3J4ITPS8gj94f0a5A6a8F eVA4XlQyJePKq7RsTvTNRXSDA0isU7LFezaCrZXfYP6a+9b5g4y1/zehM7xbfwxe VC2CvQ8tCQ1Yle2JhMGgnW+VqRlMdGooHMayDo5OOFk6WVFfDvk9xApc5Crxaq3o 4DF+5TGODA4SCdF79ShkgXyzOWoVBkkYta5as8gdmBk/Fv/fDDJ24HDZhDz9brPV WLn/pejvirpFo1zg5eHzjBmOL9N9WoGIl6sWsNfknyCZqD6ww84= =49IQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--